Loading stock data...

Celsius Files Appeal Against Disallowed $444 Million Claim in FTX Bankruptcy Case

Media 37ce28e2 6b8a 4628 8eb0 5600cfd26c0e 133807079767971920

Collapsed Crypto Lending Platform Celsius Files Notice of Appeal Against FTX

In a recent development in the ongoing bankruptcy case of collapsed crypto lending platform Celsius, the firm has filed a notice of appeal against Judge John T. Dorsey’s order that disallowed its claims for damages from FTX.

Background on the Claims

Celsius had initially claimed $2 billion in damages over alleged "disparaging statements" made by FTX officers against Celsius, which allegedly accelerated its fall. However, it later revised the claim to focus on "preferential transfers" that gave special treatment to some creditors and not others, claiming damages of $444 million.

Judge Dorsey’s Decision

In December, Judge John T. Dorsey disallowed both claims, finding that Celsius’ original proofs of claim were insufficient to preserve their preference claims. The court ruled that Celsius’ amended proofs of claim filed in July 2024 were improper because the firm didn’t seek leave to amend, the amendments were not sufficiently related to the original claims, and Celsius offered no explanation for the delay in filing.

Celsius’ Notice of Appeal

On December 31, the litigation administrator for Celsius Network and its affiliated debtors, Mohsin Meghji, filed a notice of appeal regarding Dorsey’s memorandum opinion and order. The notice of appeal argues that the original proofs of claim were sufficient to put the debtors on notice of alleged avoidance claims, and at a minimum constitute protective proofs of claim sufficient to meet the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code.

Sunil Kavuri’s Perspective

Sunil Kavuri, an FTX creditor activist, commented in a January 2 post that Celsius filed a $2 billion claim for disparagement before the bar date and then filed a $444 million amended claim for a preference claim after the bar date. According to Kavuri, Celsius claimed FTX officers made "unsubstantiated and disparaging statements" about the firm’s balance sheet and financial condition in its first claim, and then claimed $444 million in transfers to FTX entities should be returned to the bankruptcy estate in its amended claim.

Celsius’ Response

In response to Judge Dorsey’s decision, Celsius counters that the original proofs of claim were sufficient to put the debtors on notice of alleged avoidance claims. The firm also argued that at a minimum, the original proofs of claim constitute protective proofs of claim sufficient to meet the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code.

Impact on Creditors

According to an August court filing, Celsius repaid about $2.53 billion to around 250,000 creditors, representing approximately 84% of the assets owed. In late November, the lending firm said it would soon distribute an additional $127 million to creditors from its litigation recovery account.

Celsius Native Token (CEL)

The Celsius native token (CEL) surged 350%, hitting $0.56 in September following the $2.5 billion repayment. However, it has since lost most of those gains, falling back below $0.20, down 97.5% from its all-time high at the time of writing.

Implications for Crypto Market

The ongoing bankruptcy case and Celsius’ claims against FTX have significant implications for the crypto market. The collapse of Celsius highlights the risks associated with decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platforms and the need for robust regulatory frameworks to protect investors.

Key Takeaways

  • Celsius has filed a notice of appeal against Judge John T. Dorsey’s order that disallowed its claims for damages from FTX.
  • Celsius initially claimed $2 billion in damages over alleged "disparaging statements" made by FTX officers, but later revised the claim to focus on "preferential transfers".
  • The court ruled that Celsius’ amended proofs of claim were improper because the firm didn’t seek leave to amend and offered no explanation for the delay in filing.
  • Celsius counters that the original proofs of claim were sufficient to put the debtors on notice of alleged avoidance claims.

Related Reading

  • Celsius sues Tether, seeking $3.5B over Bitcoin collateral sell-off: In a separate lawsuit, Celsius is seeking $3.5 billion from Tether over the sale of Bitcoin collateral.
  • Magazine: Will ETH outperform BTC in Jan? IRS DeFi broker rules, and more: Hodler’s Digest: This article provides an overview of recent developments in the crypto market, including the potential for Ethereum to outperform Bitcoin in January.

Subscribe to the Law Decoded Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news on crypto laws and guidelines. Delivered every Monday, our newsletter will keep you informed on regulatory developments and their impact on your crypto investments.

  • By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
  • Our newsletter is a valuable resource for those looking to navigate the complex world of crypto regulations.